The whole debate is real shocking! I would like to team up with Dr
Lwaitama, facts are facts Kikwete's statement should go on be
discussed in real lengths! being Tanzanians doesn't mean that we have
to give a big YES to every statement by our president, we have to be
objective!
Be informed that, this saga suggests that there must be some
motivations behind as Lwaitama suggested. If we know to teach
tolerance to our neighbours then lets it would sound logical if we
first teach ourselves how to tolerate the Mwangosis(journalists) to do
their work, contary to this its hypocrisy and surely a big joke!
Its high time we stopped to misconceive the true meaning of
nationalism and patriotism! lets not be parrots singing in the tune of
our very leaders, we need to think beyond their statements!
I SUBMIT,
Nova Kambota
On 6/2/13, mutabaazi lugaziya <mjlugaziya@mail.com> wrote:
> Moghaka Matinyi you are very correct!
>
> If after 20 years after the genocide, there is a group still fighting, one
> has to ask oneself: How many manhours have been lost in this hullabaloo?
>
> Someone gives a sensible proposition, and , alas!, all hell breaks loose in
> Rwanda. What is saddening is for some of us to get to the arena and lend
> credence to this crap! Our President being abused is completely
> unwarranted.
>
> There is a difference between internal skirmishes and a rebel movement.
> While I do not condone the brutal suppression of internal skirmishes, a la
> Mtwara and elsewhere, I find it totally disconcerting to equate this, and
> the rebel activities in the DRC or anywhere else.
>
> Ladies and Gentlemen,
>
> Sweeping condemnations of rebels, invariably called "freedom fighters",
> "guerrillas" and stuff like that is to avoid the question:"Why do they fight
> in the first place?"
>
> There has never been a good war, neither were there ever a bad peace. But
> people still do fight. Why?
>
> Unless a people are pre-natally born with hormones of fear and cowardice,
> letting things go awry in a country unabated, is not the best option.
>
> Rwanda may have refused to heed to the proposal in a most courteous manner.
> May be some one should tell them if they persist, we are going to beat
> them.
>
> What schutzpah!
>
> MJL
>
> --
> Send Emails to wanabidii@googlegroups.com
>
> Kujiondoa Tuma Email kwenda
> wanabidii+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com Utapata Email ya kudhibitisha
> ukishatuma
>
> Disclaimer:
> Everyone posting to this Forum bears the sole responsibility for any legal
> consequences of his or her postings, and hence statements and facts must be
> presented responsibly. Your continued membership signifies that you agree to
> this disclaimer and pledge to abide by our Rules and Guidelines.
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Wanabidii" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to wanabidii+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>
--
Send Emails to wanabidii@googlegroups.com
Kujiondoa Tuma Email kwenda
wanabidii+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com Utapata Email ya kudhibitisha ukishatuma
Disclaimer:
Everyone posting to this Forum bears the sole responsibility for any legal consequences of his or her postings, and hence statements and facts must be presented responsibly. Your continued membership signifies that you agree to this disclaimer and pledge to abide by our Rules and Guidelines.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wanabidii" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to wanabidii+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Should someone who failed to figure out the answer for 3+9, consciously provide a wrong answer for 5+5 just because he failed in the first case for whichever reasons ? Besides, You can’t turn your dark stuffs Gold by narrating/ articulating back or in the first place about your neighbour’s dark side no matter how well it will be.
ReplyDeleteOne shouldn’t by default lose the right to speak what is agreed to be true in a community he lives just because at some point back or now he or she did/does something unacceptable.
The point here is, let’s not use time discussing who should say and who shouldn’t talk about the right thing, instead we should be talking about how should we move forward in providing solutions and accepting challenges and consuming wisely the suggestions given by anybody towards realizing a peaceful great-lake zone.